What To Do When You Reach Your Target Weight

What follows is an extract from ‘How To EAT LOADS And LOSE WEIGHT’ – available now. 

Here, in a nutshell, is how a low-carb or keto diet works: keep your carbs as low as possible, your fats as high as possible, your protein moderate, and your body will gradually convert your stored fats into ketones. You won’t feel hungry, you might feel healthier than you have in a very long time, and all the while you’ll get slimmer and slimmer and slimmer.

And then one day—without really trying—you will finally reach an arbitrary number on the bathroom scales that you decided some time ago was your target weight.

But let’s get one thing totally clear: that magic number was made up by you. It doesn’t really matter how you came up with that number, my point is that your body doesn’t care.

So now that we’ve established that, let’s talk about what your options are when you finally reach it. Is it possible to adjust your diet such that your weight, by and large, stays constant?

And the answer is… {drum roll}… Yes! (Sort of.)

So. How do we go about introducing carbohydrates back into our diets?

We (me and Val) have experimented with three approaches. They all have their pros and cons.

Approach 1: add carbs into your daily diet.

Each day find a way to increase the amount of carbs you’ve previously allowed yourself.

Now, how you go about this is up to you. Missing toast for breakfast? Maybe this is the moment you’ve been waiting for. Hankering for the occasional jacket potato? Your hankering days might be over.

However, from experience we’ve found there is a slight problem with this approach. A wrinkle in an otherwise sensible plan: carbs are quite triggering.

They’re supposed to be. We’re designed to get MORE hungry when we eat them, so that all those sugars can be converted to fats, and stored, for when there are no more carbs to be had. Ever tried to eat just one piece of milk chocolate from a bar, then wrap it up and save the rest for later? Your body doesn’t want you to do that. It’s a waste of chocolate! Someone else might eat that chocolate in the meantime! That might be the last bar of chocolate in existence! Eat it all! Eat it now!

Introduce carbs every day and you might find that your hunger slowly begins to rise. Instead of one slice of toast for breakfast, you’re having two. Then a snack at around 10am when you start to feel hungry again. Then lunch is suddenly a sandwich. Two sandwiches. With a large glass of freshly squeezed orange juice. And all the while your weight is hovering ABOVE that magic target number you set for yourself. Never below.

To get around this, what you might ‘like’ to do, is forget about toast or potatoes or pasta, and instead introduce carbs that you were less fond of, before you started your diet. Maybe… carrots. Parsnips. A few berries for dessert. That sort of thing.

I know, I know… I can feel your disappointment from here.

Let’s try something else.

Approach 2: add carbs into your WEEKLY diet.

Instead of subjecting yourself to triggering carbs on a daily basis, try remaining low-carb during the week, but allow yourself to ease up at the weekends. Or maybe pick a day during the week when carbs are back on the menu. ‘Toast on Tuesday.’ Whatever works for you.

Personally I find this easier. This is where I’m at right now. Weekends come and I eat whatever I fancy. I don’t go crazy—I don’t fill up my cupboards with carby treats in preparation for Friday night—I just don’t stop myself from ordering chips if I’m in a restaurant. Or buying an ice cream if I’m on the sea front.

And come Monday morning, when I stand on the bathroom scales, I look down at the reading, and… “Oops!”—and then I return to low-carb. Sometimes (if I’ve really overdone it) I’ll start a sixteen-hour fast after my Monday evening meal.

Now I’m not going to lie to you; this approach requires discipline. And it tends to work better if you’re the sort of person who might go out for a meal at the weekends, or order a takeaway. It’s not so easy if there are still carbs, in your house, waiting to be consumed, when the weekend is over.

Also, if you have any kind of medical condition that’s made worse by sugars (such as asthma, or acid reflux) then bear in mind that a total carb binge at the weekend could come back and bite you in your ever-expanding bottom.

Approach 3: add carbs whenever you’re in credit.

Which leads us onto the third approach; an amalgamation of the first two ideas.

Weight yourself each morning. If you’re OVER your target weight, no carbs for you. Back on the keto wagon. But, if you’re UNDER your target weight—happy days!—today you can have some carbs.

Now, personally speaking, this is the approach I took for almost a year after I’d initially reached my target weight, and it worked quite well. Quite.

However it took me most of that year to learn that on the days I found myself ‘in credit’ (which were nowhere near as often as I liked) I couldn’t slam my foot on the gas and eat my body weight in potato crisps. Followed by a pizza. And flapjacks. And ice cream.

Gradually I had to learn (the hard way) that it was better to squeeze that metaphorical gas pedal, just gently.

So, if I was in credit I could enjoy a chocolate bar (singular). OR some chips. OR half a pizza. OR a five bean curry. If I did that, then maybe, just maybe, I could do the same a couple of days later. Maybe even the following day.

Finally, I was maintaining.

If you’ve got any maintaining tips or tricks, feel free to share them with me in the Facebook Group for this book. Link below.


How To Eat Loads and Lose WeightBUY the book here

READ the opening chapter here

Join the discussion on our Facebook Group

Why Counting Calories is a WASTE of time

What follows is an extract from ‘How To EAT LOADS And LOSE WEIGHT’ – available now. 

Counting calories has, for a long time, been a popular way of regulating a diet. Count the number of calories you consume, subtract the number of calories you burn, and if the number you’re left with is a minus—congratulations!—your body must have been forced to ‘burn fat’: Calories in versus calories out.

It’s an elegant theory, one that most people can easily get their heads around, and one that is supported by law; food manufacturers are legally obliged to print the total number of calories, as well as a host of other nutritional information, on all food packaging, to make your calorie counting efforts easier.

Such a shame then, that it’s absolute tosh.

Firstly, the ‘calories in calories out’ concept assumes that the amount of calories your body ‘burns’ is consistent. But that’s not actually true.

Recently—and by recent I mean one hundred years ago—two gentlemen published a study entitled A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism (October 8, 1918). What J Arthur Harris & Francis G Benedict showed was that if you reduce the amount of calories you consume, the body performs a little self-regulation and adjusts the number of calories ‘burnt’—and by a similar amount. This is called your metabolism.

It’s little like putting your phone into ‘lower power mode’. When you consistently eat less, your body notices, and automatically starts to conserve energy. The downside is that, just like your phone, in low-power mode you don’t operate quite as smoothly. You might feel tired. A little sluggish. Colder than usual. But at least you’re not going to have to rely on your stored fats. Phew!

Despite the fact that the metabolism study has been replicated many, many times, the weight loss industry (and the world at large) has, by-and-large, chosen to ignore this rather crucial piece of information—not least because it renders the whole ‘calories in calories out’ notion completely useless. Have you been steadily reducing your meal sizes in the hopes that your body will be forced to fall back on its reserves? Oh dear. I have some bad news for you.

But people have been counting calories for decades…

That’s true.

Back in the 1980s, when the food guidelines in America and the UK were changed in line with the calorie counting, low-fat ethic, obesity in this country and the entire western world increased dramatically, but interestingly the average calorific intake actually fell.

We ate fewer calories, but we still got fatter.

The same decade also saw an explosion of fitness gurus, each with a video to sell. Fluorescent leggings and leg warmers became a thing. People started jogging. Gym membership escalated. The amount of exercise we were doing increased—and has done ever since.

We exercised more, burnt more calories… and yet we still got fatter.

Regardless of what you’ve read, or heard, or what your doctor or weight-loss guru may have told you, the evidence of the past thirty five years is pretty damning: the ‘calories in versus calories out’ equation just doesn’t add up.

What are calories anyway?

Aside from the whole metabolism issue, my biggest problem with our obsession with calories is this:

Calories are not things!

A calorie is a measurement. Like a centimetre. Or an inch. Or degrees Celsius. Or Fahrenheit. Or minutes!

What does the humble calorie measure? Energy.

Its exact definition is this:

the energy required to raise the temperature
of 1 gram of water through 1 °C.

When I was at school, I remember being given a ‘science experiment’ to determine the amount of ‘energy’ in a peanut. It went something like this:

Each student was given a peanut, a test tube, and a thermometer. We put one gram of water in the test tube, gripped the peanut with metal tongs, and then set fire to it. We held the burning peanut under the test tube, and when the nut eventually burnt itself out, made a note of the final temperature. From this we were supposed to be able to work out how many calories that humble peanut had.

Even at the time this experiment seemed flawed. For starters, surely the glass test tube, even the tongs, were absorbing some of the heat (and therefore the ‘energy’)? And surely it made a difference how close you held your peanut to the test tube?

But what bothered me most was I couldn’t see how this experiment could be replicated for other food.

Why weren’t we given a stick of celery? Or a steak? Or a potato? Or a mars bar? My adolescent brain quickly concluded it was because my teacher knew these things wouldn’t burn, which would render his hinky experiment completely useless. Being a teenager, I immediately took the opportunity to feel betrayed, hoodwinked, and angry. I probably had a good sulk about it.

Looking back now I realise that I may have inadvertently stumbled on something extremely important: When it comes to calories, you cannot treat all foods as equal.

We like to think that 100 calories of peanuts is exactly the same as a 100 calories of kale. But it isn’t.

Aside from the fact that it’s difficult to set fire to kale (!!), your body will treat those two foods in very different ways.

100 calories of peanuts has about sixteen grams of carbs. Whereas the kale has half that. Meaning that 100 calories of peanuts will yield more glucose, will cause your blood sugar to rise (more than the kale), stimulate the production of insulin (more than the kale), and ultimately cause you to store more of that glucose as fat—all whilst increasing your appetite. Exactly the same number of calories… but ultimately MORE body fat.

100 calories of peanuts will make you fatter
than 100 calories of kale!

Same number of calories, ultimately MORE body fat.

Let’s take this one step further. Let’s swap those 100 calories of kale for 100 calories of something ‘healthy’ like… rice.

100 calories of rice contain about 28 grams of carbs. Almost twice as much as the peanuts. Meaning that…

100 calories of rice will make you fatter
than 100 calories of peanuts!

Again; same number of calories, ultimately MORE body fat.

Let’s go further still. Let’s swap those 100 calories of peanuts for 100 calories of… petrol.

Petrol yields a staggering amount of energy. That’s why we use it to fuel our cars. And as calories are a measurement of energy, we know that a gallon of petrol is about 30,000 calories. Roughly. Meaning that 100 calories of petrol isn’t going to be very much. How many carbs in 100 calories of petrol? I have no idea. But my instincts tell me that drinking petrol, even in small amounts, is a really, really bad idea, and would probably make you very ill. Or dead.

That said, it would, once and for all, prove the point I’m trying to make—that your body responds completely differently to the foods you eat, and it doesn’t give two hoots about calories!

I want you to understand this: there are no calories in your food. Calories are not things. It’s a measurement. A measurement of one tiny aspect of the complicated biological process that goes into keeping you alive.

Counting calories is about as useful as counting centimetres, or inches. In fact, I’d like to suggest that counting centimetres sort of makes more sense. The next time you go grocery shopping, take a 12 inch ruler with you and measure each item you buy. Theoretically, the fewer centimetres a food has, the less weight you should put on! Get those total centimetres down over the coming weeks and you are just as likely to lose weight.

Or…

You could stop counting calories, and start counting carbs.


How To Eat Loads and Lose WeightBUY the book here

READ the opening chapter here

Join the discussion on our Facebook Group

Phoenix FM Happy Club: We answer your happiness related questions

Earlier this month I joined the delightful Michelle Ward of Phoenix98 FM to discuss ‘happiness’, and to answer your happiness related questions.

This month’s questions were…

  • How do I control my uncontrollable rage when people do not follow my legitimate instructions?
  • How do you achieve a healthy work/life balance? As in, how can you effectively balance work and home life, especially when you work from home?
  • How can I be happy with my diet when I can’t afford lobster and fillet steak each day?
  • I want to change my life completely; my job, my looks, etc. Where do I start on such a monumentous task?
  • How do I get an octopus into a paper bag?
  • I would like to know Peter’s tips for staying focused on goals, and for being organised when the path is full of obstacles.
  • Why is Peter Jones’ name a mash up of the names of two of the band members of The Monkees?

To listen to the show click the big play button in the image below (or if you’re reading this in an email, click here)

How To Start Dating And Stop Waiting (mentioned throughout the show) is due out February 2014, How To Eat Loads And Stay Slim is available, now, in three formats.

If you have a question for next month’s show feel free to drop me a line, post a comment below, tweet either myself or Michelle, or send me a message on facebook. We’ll get through as many as we’re able.


Michelle’s live on Phoenix FM every weekday from 10am.

To listen to other radio interviews (and audio content) about How To Eat Loads And Stay Slim click here